BycivillawinproxysystemAbstract:
Theproxywasanimportantcivillawsystem,ourcountry"Generalprovisionsofthecivillaw"fourthchapterofsecondhasmadethestipulationtotheproxysystem.Buttooissimple,theprinciplein"Generalprovisionsofthecivillaw"totheproxyquestionstipulation,hasnotbeenabletomeetthejudicialpracticeneed,urgentlyawaitstoperformfromthelegislationtoconsummate.Amongthem,thetableseestheproxybooktotakeonekindhasnorighttoact,asaresultofthepowerofattorneyrepresentationexistence,andhascausedthegoodintentionsthirdpersonoffaith,involvedthetransactionsecurityquestiontothegoodintentionsthirdpersonofbenefitprotection.Therefore,thetableseestheproxysystemtheestablishmentmainlyisstemsfromtheprotectiongoodintentionsthirdpersonoflegitimaterightsandinterests,promotesthemarkettransactionsecuritygoal.Thissystemismarketeconomylawofdevelopmentmanifesting.Butourcountrycontractlawfinallyindirectlywillactstipulatesinthecontractofbailment,butwillnotbethestipulationin行纪thecontract,thismainlywillbeforemphasizetheindirectproxyand行纪thedifference.Distinguishestheindirectproxywith行纪,regardingcorrectlyissuitablethecontractlaw,thesolutionrelated,hastheextremelyvitalsignificance.Thisarticlehasnorightontheconsummationtoactthesystem,thetableseestheproxysysteminparticular,aswellasindirectproxywith行纪thedisputequestionmakesanelaboration.